Should be, but currently not.
I believe the rights of the property owner supercede the rights of the visitor.
For example, should someone who comes onto your property have the freedom to excercsie his rights to freedom of expression as First Amendment guarantees?
>For example, should someone who comes onto your property have the freedom to excercsie his rights to freedom of expression as First Amendment guarantees?
Of course!
But then again, I *ALSO* believe that someone coming onto your property uninvited* constitutes ‘trespassing’ and that shooting him constitutes the protection of [my/the owner’s] property.
*I also believe that even if someone *is* invited that invitation could be revoked by its issuer at any time and for any reason; though that revocation should be verbalized and not just “out-of-the-blue.”