That’s up to the employer. Your right to carry doesn’t trump your employer’s property rights.
>Your right to carry doesn’t trump your employer’s property rights.
But what about YOUR property rights? Or YOUR self-defense rights?
If your right to be armed is recognized as inalienable/inherent then they are necessarily not-repudiatable; this can be seen as true even in disarmed prison populations: self defense *is* justification for even homicide. Why should you, who is not even indicted for a crime, be disarmed like a common criminal?
“Your right to carry doesn’t trump your employer’s property rights.”
So your employer’s right to a thing (property) trumps your right to defend your life? Interesting thought process there. Sounds similar to some historical justifications of some pretty nasty things throughout history. Sorry, but it is...