But in the case of believing, I believe that he is telling the truth.
And Boyd says she is lying. Meaning, therefore, that you believe that Jeanne Assam is lying. This is simple logic.
And yet you cannot just say so. Why is it so hard for you simply to admit that you think she's lying? What are you afraid of?
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you, a member of the very church in question, know that there's more to the story, and aren't saying what it is.
You condemn others for jumping to conclusions (the post demanding proof of her lying) and yet you jump right in with your accusations. When I answer with proof, you accuse me of throwing stones. Why do you care so much if she lied or not? Why are you defending her? Does not NLC have the right to enforce it's standards of morality in church leadership? You doubt Boyd's word even though you have no proof. I doubt her word and I gave you proof.
Dude, you I nailed you and your pride can't let go, admit it, I gave you proof and you started ripping on me.