1. You said give proof of her lying, I gave it to you
2. You answered me and said it was old news and not germain to the argument. I disagree, it is a case of 2 people's words against each other. One person with a known case of lying versus someone know for their integrity.
3. You then say I cast stones. I have not judged her nor can you post any of my words that say so. Instead you have repeatedly twisted my words and ideas.
4. You say I said "she lied in the past so she must be lying now". I did not say that. You have taken my argument and filled in the blanks with your own ideas and attributed them to me (how very liberal of you). All I said was she has a history of lying. By the way, signing offical government documents untruthfully is perjury, that is evidence of her character in a court of law.
5. You keep posting that your think the truth if somewhere between what she says and what Body says. You have absolutely no proof he has lied, yet you impugn his character. You impugn Brady Boyd without any proof but you demand from others for their views of her being a liar. That is called a double standard. In otherwords you are a hypocrite.
6. You impugn my intergrity by saying I cast stones at her by accussing her of lying. I did not accuse her of lying. I said she had perjured herself in the past which is relevant to this story. I have not said anything about this case in terms of her sexuality, her truthfulness in this matter nor have I condemned her. As far as I am concerned, she can sit next to me anytime she wants in church
R9ebt, you are sophmoric in your attacks. You ask questions, somebody gives you a factual answer, you attack them for casting stones. You are intellectually dishonest, practice what you accuse of others and don't know when to shut up.
You gave proof that she has lied in the past, not that she's lying now. You, too, have probably lied sometime in your past -- are you therefore lying now, too?
2. You answered me and said it was old news and not germain to the argument. I disagree, it is a case of 2 people's words against each other. One person with a known case of lying versus someone know for their integrity.
St. Paul would be glad to hear your condemnation of him.
3. You then say I cast stones. I have not judged her nor can you post any of my words that say so.
You're calling her a liar. Is that not judgment?
4. You say I said "she lied in the past so she must be lying now". I did not say that.
Um.... Is that not exactly what you JUST did, in your second point? My gosh, man: please try to pay attention to your own thoughts!
5. You keep posting that your think the truth if somewhere between what she says and what Body says. You have absolutely no proof he has lied, yet you impugn his character.
I carefully noted that it was my opinion that he did not tell the whole truth here. It is possible that Mr. Noreen simply failed to quote him fully. The fact remains, however, that something apparently happened, and for whatever reason Mr. Boyd's quoted comments do not address it. You should perhaps wonder why.
6. You impugn my intergrity by saying I cast stones at her by accussing her of lying. I did not accuse her of lying.
Must we go through this again?
R9ebt, you are sophmoric in your attacks.
I see your temper got the best of you on that one. And yet it is apparent that you cannot even see the difficulties with your own responses -- perhaps "sophomoric" responses are more than is needed in your case.