Posted on 02/24/2011 2:40:49 PM PST by La Enchiladita
The U.S. Army psychiatrist who slaughtered 13 people on a Texas military base could face the death penalty as officials wrangle over his fate, it has emerged.
Major Nadal Hasan was said to have cried out 'Allahu akbar!' before he opened fire on troops and civilians, killing 13 and injuring 32 at Fort Hood in 2009. His fate now lies in the hands of brigade commander Col. Morgan Lamb, who is due to release a report in which he is expected to recommend a court martial.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
FWIW, we won't execute a paralyzed man ( you can hear the howls now)..instead, he'll get a lifetime of medical care are ass-wipes in a prison facility..
FWIW, we won't execute a paralyzed man ( you can hear the howls now)..instead, he'll get a lifetime of medical care and ass-wipes in a prison facility..
Why the cigarette? Don’t you know that smoking endangers ones health? And what about the firing squad? Do you want to expose them to secondary smoke inhalation?
I'll be we'll be getting lawsuit after lawsuit when he's not cleaned up according to the requirements of halal.
That is, in the unlikely event that Obama doesn't pardon him on the way out.
He should already be taking a dirt nap.
If he can’t stand ,nail him to the wall in a standing position and then shoot him
I say, raffle of tickets to be on the firing squad to raise money for families of those he killed.
...and he should be made to crawl to the his own gallows unassisted!
His blindfold should be defective and look like the Lone Rangers or Batman’s with the eye holes cut open so he could watch to guns fire at him and die a soulless death
His blindfold should be defective and look like the Lone Rangers or Batman’s with the eye holes cut open so he could watch to guns fire at him and die a soulless death
>FYI..Hasan is STILL getting paid...now that really, REALLY burns me...there has to be somethign wrong with that system.
Compare and contrast to LTC Lakin.
What the heck is there to "wrangle" about? Who is there that is MORE deserving of death?
Remember who is CIC- Barrak Hussein Obama - I am sure the heat is on these officers to walk very gingerly on the issue.
Between Obama and Eric Holder; the heat is on.
You mean scraped off with a flat rock?
Hang’m!
Have a little party for muslim boy and fix it so the last thing he sees before he dies a miserable death is a cross.
couldnt they re direct that pay to the family of his most needy victim?
My mind runs wild ...
A 2x poster of a Helen Thomas Face Shot for his Death Cell.
A last meal of Pork&Beans.
A firing squad loaded with pork-fat greased bullets,
A shroud made of pig skin.
(This would also work for those murdering Somali Pirates)
>couldnt they re direct that pay to the family of his most needy victim?
I don’t think so.
The Constitution’s Bill of Rights is surprisingly property-rights focused: over 60% of the 10 Amendments involve them. The fifth prohibits it because it would violate this portion: “nor be deprived of life, liberty, **or property, without due process of law**”
While I see what you’re getting at I believe it is more hurtful to try to circumvent the Constitution in the manner you suggest than you may realize. We have an obscene number of laws —and even more rules and regulations— which circumvent the Constitution, at *all* levels of governance. In my home state of New Mexico, for example, the State Constitution forbids laws abridging “the right of the Citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense;” furthermore it constrains Counties and Municipalities from “regulating, **in any way**, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.”
Yet, if you go to any County or City Courthouse you’ll see a “No Weapons” sign; when you inquire into the matter you get one of two answers 1) there is *NO* state law regarding weapons in the courtroom, or [the one offered by the security-guys] 2)”It’s the judge’s decision.” And so we have a clear example of a situation where the government is exceeding its legitimate authority... sadly this is NOT uncommon; but it’s even worse where there are Statutes or Ordinances which clearly violate the Constitution which are prosecuted anyway. (Like NMSA 30-7-2.4, which for all practical purposes makes it a crime for someone living on-campus to keep or bear firearms.)
US Constitution, Amd 5 —> http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=query&iid=1ce95e25.7bd11288.0.0&q=%5BGroup%20%27usc%20amendv%27%5D
New Mexico State Constitution, Art II, Sec 6 —> http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=query&iid=1ce95e25.7bd11288.0.0&q=%5BGroup%20%27nmc%20artii-6%27%5D
NMSA 30-7-2.4 —> http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=query&iid=1ce95e25.7bd11288.0.0&q=%5BGroup%20%2730-7-2.4%27%5D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.