Eric Holder is, to say the least, a very poor Attorney General, but I do think that he "knows the difference between the 5th and 14th Amendments." He may have no regard for them, or for the Constitution itself, for that matter, but there was nothing in his characterization of the 5th Amendment today that suggests the sort of gross ignorance that you would apparently ascribe to him. With all due respect, I think you weaken your case by overstating it in such fashion.
For my part, I reject the notion that there is any "equal protection" issue here at all. I don't think that any legal status, or constitutional "classification," should be assigned to a person on account of his or her sexual practices.
Even if I erred in my zeal to go after this worst of all Attorney Generals, we’ll survive that.
But will the republic survive the legal and political elites’ failure to provide equal protection to tens of millions of persons in the womb, or their determination to pervert equal protection by granting such it to perverted sexual licentiousness? It’s highly doubtful.
One thing we know for sure: tens of millions have not survived it.