Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Hospital May Still Remove Baby Joseph's Life Support
LifeNews.com ^ | February 22, 2011 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 02/22/2011 1:45:09 PM PST by julieee

Canadian Hospital May Still Remove Baby Joseph's Life Support

Windsor, Canada -- A Canadian hospital is still threatening to remove the life support for Baby Joseph Maraachli, a one-year-old boy from Windsor, Ontario, has been at Victoria Hospital in London since October with a rare deteriorating condition that is not improving.

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/02/22/canadian-hospital-may-still-remove-baby-josephs-life-support/

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canadianhospital; joseph

1 posted on 02/22/2011 1:45:13 PM PST by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee

The want to kill the baby PERIOD..


2 posted on 02/22/2011 1:51:44 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

It is bizarre to see healers who have become emotionally invested in wanting to kill. Howsoever they rationalize what they are doing, though, they still have vulnerability.

That vulnerability is their anonymity. There are living, breathing people who want to kill this baby, and though they can pretend whatever they want to pretend to themselves, other people are not going to buy it.

So the very best thing that could happen, that could make such people stop doing this, would be for them to lose their anonymity.

With their name and picture on the Internet, associated with their desire to kill an infant, how easy will it be for them to continue the pretense that they are a healer?

Imagine sitting in a restaurant, when some child chimes in, “Look, mommy, there’s the man that killed the baby!”

The rest of *that* meal is going to be fun, I bet. Society has a real down on child killers, and are not going to settle down why they try to explain why they *needed* to kill a baby.


3 posted on 02/22/2011 3:12:13 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

It is bizarre to see healers who have become emotionally invested in wanting to kill. Howsoever they rationalize what they are doing, though, they still have vulnerability.

That vulnerability is their anonymity. There are living, breathing people who want to kill this baby, and though they can pretend whatever they want to pretend to themselves, other people are not going to buy it.

So the very best thing that could happen, that could make such people stop doing this, would be for them to lose their anonymity.

With their name and picture on the Internet, associated with their desire to kill an infant, how easy will it be for them to continue the pretense that they are a healer?

Imagine sitting in a restaurant, when some child chimes in, “Look, mommy, there’s the man that killed the baby!”

The rest of *that* meal is going to be fun, I bet. Society has a real down on child killers, and are not going to settle down while they try to explain why they *needed* to kill a baby.


4 posted on 02/22/2011 3:12:25 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

I just don’t get why they won’t let them take him home to die. A trac does not cost that much and he isn’t going to live longer than a few more months.What evil the Canadian healthcare system is to do this to those parents.


5 posted on 02/22/2011 5:06:54 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson