[SeeSac]

Please allow me to expand upon the above well thought out phrase. The state has no right ti intervene after a child dies in such cases because they do not own the child. The parent has created and raised the child - not Da Gooberment.

Following your logic the parents can abort the child because they 'own' it?

[GladesGuru]

The short answer is: Yes.

The full answer is: When a mother-to- be has no job, no husband, and no way to provide for the child-to-be, only the uncaring would demand that the state force the birth of a child which can’t be cared for, by an unwilling mother, who will be without family or husband.

[GladesGuru]

Addendum to my last post to you.

The government must not be allowed to subsidize the production of ‘bachelor’s children’ by taxing others to support the reproduction of teh irresponsible, the incompetent, the un-acculturated, the illegal aliens, ad nauseam.

Oh, don’t forget OctoMom and the fearlessly fecund followers of MadMo.