Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedMDer

I am no fan of Iran, but if this article is true, I don’t see what standing we have to do this.


2 posted on 02/21/2011 1:59:52 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DonaldC

I am no fan of Obama, but if this article is true, I salute him.


7 posted on 02/21/2011 2:01:37 PM PST by Piranha (Obama won like Bernie Madoff attracted investors: by lying about his values, policy and plans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

Community organizing on the open seas.


10 posted on 02/21/2011 2:02:16 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC
...I don’t see what standing we have to do this.

UN resolutions and sanctions. Same reasoning we used to go into Iraq.

14 posted on 02/21/2011 2:04:37 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC
According to the article....

"permitted by the last round of UN sanctions against Iran in the case of suspicious war freights"

15 posted on 02/21/2011 2:05:45 PM PST by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

Standing is only an issue when dealing with the rational. Moslims are not rational.

I am more concerned with the possibility of a crude nuke on one of the ships. Trading a carrier and escort ships for a couple of rats a** Iranian mini ships is hardly a valid trade, though something which Obama might well set us up for.


19 posted on 02/21/2011 2:06:17 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

We through Uhbommer rae probably escorting them so israel can’t pop em easily


21 posted on 02/21/2011 2:09:00 PM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC
Debka has a high index of skepticism. The transit of warships through the Suez Canal is controlled by Egypt not the US Navy.
32 posted on 02/21/2011 2:16:30 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

There were rumors that Iran was going to one of the countries in revolt to deliver weapons.

Sanctions


33 posted on 02/21/2011 2:16:42 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

Depends on what they’re carrying, I suppose.


47 posted on 02/21/2011 2:30:09 PM PST by airborne (Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

The standing is described at the end of the article:

“It raised the possibility that the moment they venture to sail into the Suez Canal, the two Iranian warships will be boxed in between the Enterprise and the Kearsarge and called upon to allow their cargoes to be inspected as permitted by the last round of UN sanctions against Iran in the case of suspicious war freights.”


56 posted on 02/21/2011 2:38:02 PM PST by rwa265 (Christ my Cornerstone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC

****** “I am no fan of Iran, but if this article is true, I don’t see what standing we have to do this.” ******

During the Cold War this was very Common we called it “F**k F**k” we would actually (and so would the Russians) raise the Black Ball (Steering Casualty) and we would actually bounce off of each other, at those times we took the opportunity to throw Oranges, Playboy Magazines etc over to our Russian Counterparts which they appreciated (we got the chance in some ports to actually talk with Russian Sailors)

TT


63 posted on 02/21/2011 2:55:40 PM PST by TexasTransplant (I got your Alla Akbar and your 72 Virgins... when ya wanna meet up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC
I am no fan of Iran, but if this article is true, I don’t see what standing we have to do this.

About the same standing Iran had to run multiple speedboat/torpedo missile drills around our fleet. We're not on polite terms.

68 posted on 02/21/2011 4:09:52 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (/s, in case you need to ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DonaldC
I am no fan of Iran, but if this article is true, I don’t see what standing we have to do this.

To do "this" what?
So long as neither side initiates hostile action, by treaties every nation is entitled to transit the canal.

71 posted on 02/21/2011 8:09:09 PM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson