Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truthfreedom
And states rights, and wanting to limit the power of fedgov is not the same as libertarianism.

Oh, I misunderstood you. I misread and thought you were in favor of States Rights. But it seems that all you want is depraved immoral anarchy. I was under the impression that Libertarians at least in theory respected States Rights, guess I am wrong.

If Libertarianism isn't about States Rights or wanting to limit the power of the federal government, what is it about other than legalized drugs, porn, prostitution and homo-rights?

285 posted on 02/21/2011 6:45:14 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

I think we’re in agreement here.

Standard tea party limited constitutional government isn’t the same as libertarianism.

You agree with that statement, right? Don’t draw anything further from it. Just that statement.

Some Libertarians like Roe v Wade. That was overruling the previous states rights position. It’s plenty complicated, etc., I just wanted to say that these 2 things are different.

I’m not a Libertarian. I don’t really know much about it. I’m more of a Constitutionalist, which is basically what Ron Paul and the tea party are. This differs from some Libertarians, who like Roe v Wade.


295 posted on 02/21/2011 7:10:16 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson