Posted on 02/19/2011 10:14:16 AM PST by Ol' Sparky
Edited on 02/19/2011 1:04:08 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
At least one mystery from Sarah Palin's short reign as governor of Alaska appears to have been cleared up by claims made in a manuscript for a book proposed by former Palin aide and confident Frank Bailey.
Many have wondered why Palin, who professes to be pro-life, named to the Alaska Supreme Court Morgan Christen, who is pro-choice. The move took both conservatives and liberals by surprise in 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at alaskadispatch.com ...
Again, what principled conservative doesn’t step up and try to reform a process that leaves her with two liberal choices for the Supreme Court? Is there any evidence Palin did that?
The House doesn't give one executive experience.
I said it on another thread: If you really believe Governor Palin was up to no good and everybody managed to keep it quiet through the last two and a half years of Palin media obsession until this idiot released his book, I want a chance to try to sell Little Diomede Island to you. Because if you really believe that, you’re probably stupid enough to give me good money for it.
Try reading up on this subject a bit more: http://community.adn.com/node/140438#
Just ask president Hunter about that, he got beat by "unsure" in several primaries, and never polled above 1% in any republican primary. He was a lot more experienced and qualified than Bachmann. You might want to think about that, but judging from your responses on this thread, that's going to be hard for you.
Why are you carrying water for the enemy?
Are you a “I like Sarah but...”er?
And as an unabashed conservative, a conception-to-natural-death pro-lifer and definitely NOT a member of the Church of Palin, I say it's way past time Palin's detractors stop posting obvious lies trumped up by obvious flaming liberals and then following it up with histrionic whining.
You don't think she's the right candidate Great. Make your case like a conservative instead of posting liberal claptrap any 8th grader would find suspicious.
No, complaining about being accused of being a Troll when I support candidates like Cain and Bachmann.
Certain people like you don't seem to get the fact that many conservatives favor more principled conservatives that have a better chance of winning than Palin.
Attacking the Queen is not the equivalent of not being conservative or being a troll.
Then, how did we end up with two of them winning the nomination of their parties in the last election?
What you are getting ripped for (and rightfully so) is your regurgitation of liberal crap to make your point. So stop your whining. You posted crap to make your point, you deserve the grief you are getting for such.
Senators, not congresscritters. And do you really think it was a good choice between the two of them?
Hammer, meet nail.
I'm carrying the water for conservatives candidates -- Cain, Bachmann, etc. -- that have a better chance of winning and don't have negative poll numbers over 50%.
Posting discredited claptrap written and promoted by a collection of liberals without evaluating the validity of the sources is the equivalent of being a troll, because that's pretty much what trolls do. So, either you're trolling or you're sincere but don't belong in an adult conversation about this issue.
I say that as someone who is not supporting Palin for the nomination at this point.
Try making the case for your choices instead of trying to tear down Palin with nonsense.
Merci, mon ami.
Posting discredited claptrap written and promoted by a collection of liberals without evaluating the validity of the sources is the equivalent of being a troll, because that's pretty much what trolls do. So, either you're trolling or you're sincere but don't belong in an adult conversation about this issue.
I say that as someone who is not supporting Palin for the nomination at this point.
So tell me honestly, if you can - if I went to some indy nutcase blog and found a crap post attacking Bachmann (and you know those are out there), and then posted that here on FR to try and tear Bachmann down as a means to make Palin seem like the right choice - what would your reaction be?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.