In other words, you are confusing a logical and well explained opinion with an emotional reaction. Because some here give good reasons for not supporting Palin, the reactive accusation is that they are “haters”.
It merely points out your limited ability to debate in a civil manner. That's all.
I must have struck a nerve.
It’s so funny. Make a blanket statement and watch to see who self identifies.
I should have added to my post...
If this offends you, well, you know who you are.
I agree with most of what you say, even though I think Palin would be a good choice and you don't. So.....all things considered, my choice today is Palin. In the spirit of debate in a civil manner, are you ready to name one person, not a few, that would be your choice?