Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

We have been in a low level civil war between the federal government along with it growing power and the US population for several years.

It won’t take much to turn it ‘hot’.


11 posted on 02/18/2011 8:51:57 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Le Chien Rouge

State job number on upswing despite recession
By George Avalos
California’s state government has managed to add thousands of jobs
during this past year, defying a mammoth budget deficit and a brutal
recession.
The job growth for state workers contrasts with the loss of 759,000
jobs in California’s private industry in the past 12 months
&http://www.mercurynews.com/topstories/ci_12984385?nclick_check=1&forced=true
not to mention gubermint employees and their pensions...
Reform advocates are spotlighting those with extravagant pensions
— $100,000 or more — as a way to get the public’s attention and
emphasize that the current system is unsustainable.
http://www.modbee.com/editorials/story/803636.html
Perhaps the real reason why public-sector pension costs have not been tackled is that the full bill has never been revealed to taxpayers.
** The great public-sector pension rip-off **
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13988606
From The Economist print edition
July 9, 2009
JOIN a private-sector company these days and you will be very lucky if you get a pension linked to your final salary. In Britain almost three out of four companies that retain such schemes have closed them to new employees. The cost of paying such benefits, which are partly linked to inflation and offer payouts to surviving spouses, is simply too high now that many retirees are surviving into their 80s.
Yet most new public-sector employees in Britain and America continue to benefit from pensions linked to their salaries. The pension costs facing the public sector are roughly the same as those facing the private sector; their employees are likely to live just as long. But because of the presumed largesse of future taxpayers, governments seem under much less pressure to reduce their pension costs. In 2005 a reform package in Britain raised the retirement age for new state employees, but still left existing employees able to retire at 60.

just wait till reform comes to CA...it will make WI look like nothing.


17 posted on 02/18/2011 8:54:28 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Le Chien Rouge

We aren’t even a federal republic any more. Obama wants to be a dictator. Why do we even have that old sheepskin parchment called the Constitution in DC under glass and lasers? It says that all powers not described within are to be left to the states!!! Our government employees (EMPLOYEES OF US!!) “swear” to uphold that silly old parchment! Yet THIS crap occurs.

WHEN ARE WE GOING TO WAKE UP AND TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK? When??


35 posted on 02/18/2011 9:09:54 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson