I suspect that Palin basically meant that if CPAC wants to have homosexuals and jihadists speaking for them, why should she care?
My friend, from what I know, Palin has never spoken at CPAC, and she doesn’t care much for it’s President. So how can this be construed as Palin be pro-gay? It sounds like she’s saying that whoever speaks at CPAC is their problem, not hers
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/01/sarah-palin-re-tweets-in-support-of-gays.html
Sarah Palin Re-Tweets in Support of Gays
But Monday night the former Alaska governor re-tweeted a post from conservative talk show host and blogger Tammy Bruce, who is lesbian, appearing to indirectly cast support for gays and an end to the ban on openly gay members of the U.S. military.
“I know Gov Palin & this "anti-gay" meme has been a lie--plain & simple. She's a decent woman & friend to the community,” Bruce said later.
Note in this video, Palin says she doesn't think DADT should be repealed "right now," meaning she does have a problem with it being repealed in the future:
Palin Says Congress Should Not Repeal DADT 'Right Now'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_krYcGZhJk
There is no doubt in my mind that a President Palin will not reinstate DADT.