I don’t think the reconsideration has to do primarily with eligibility, rather with atty Hemenway’s snookering the court or gettting one past them by making a motion for recusal of the two obama appointees. The court did not act on the motion so it should be granted. Accordingly they should be recused from this conference.
Whether they accept the case or not is still up for grabs. Two things of note, Abercrombie’s supposed statement there is no long form for Obama as well as the latest poll showing millions of Americans doubt Obamas place of birth. Despite trying to avoid the issue the SCOTUS will have to hear it sooner or later. The last consideration was about 30 days ago and the only significant news since then was Aercrombies and the new poll.
more info here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2675406/posts
Despite trying to avoid the issue the SCOTUS will have to hear it sooner or later.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Why would they “have to hear it”? I pray that you are right, but I don’t get why they would “have to hear it”?