“No matter what we, or indeed the court, thinks about Natural Born Citizenship, is not at law at the moment. What the conference about is recusal of the Obama appointees and the possible effects of POTUS’ use of a name not legally his.”
I don’t want to get too far in over my head now, but I think the Conference is considering Hemenway’s and Hollister’s Petition for Rehearing. For the umpteenth time, I am NOT a lawyer, but I did sleep with one last night.
The Petition for Rehearing itself asks the Court to rehear their original Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
That original Petition, IIRC, does include questions about the Framers’ intent about inserting the NBC language into the Constitution. I believe the motion for recusal of the two Obama appointees also raised the NBC question.
In that case, the NBC question would be before the Court at its upcoming Conference. I don’t recall the use of different names/aliases being an issue or questions raised, although the defendant/respondent is “Soetoro” a/k/a Obama.
As Bette Davis said,
"Fasten your seat belt. It's going to be a bumpy night."
I think the Conference is considering Hemenway’s and Hollister’s Petition for Rehearing.
I surely hope so, but they are playing this very close to their vest. We won't know until we know and that will be when they want us to know. Exciting, ain't it?