Why the Supreme Court has been compelled to hold a new hearing on Obama’s eligibility.

HillBuzz ^ | February 17,2011 | Kevin DuJan

[dalight]

Drudge has linked this story from World Net Daily that notes the odd decision by the Supreme Court to hold a new “conference” on Obama’s eligibility to hold the presidency.

Let’s research WHY the court could be compelled to do this.

It MUST have something to do with the fact that Obama has no birth certificate on file in the Hawaiian Hall of Records with the name “Barack Hussein Obama” on it — since his original Hawaiian birth certificate with that name was sealed in the 1970s when he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, his stepfather. At the time of adoption, a child’s original birth certificate is sealed away and replaced in the Hall of Records by a new birth certificate that bears the adopted parents’ names and the child’s new name, if a new name is given.

This is what happened to Obama, when he was renamed “Soetobakh” by his mother and stepfather at the time of adoption.

[ONEBYEONE]

O’Reilly is so full of his own self importance.

[LucyT]

Little Barry has a new name? Soetobakh???

. . . . Another name? Does this alias also have a social security number?

Thanks, azishot.

[Razzz42]

O’bummer is a pawn. Look behind the curtain to find who conspired for all these events to fall into place and continue to cover up the tracks. All members of Congress would be a good start.

[ROTB]

1) Don’t argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
2) There is no honor in out-debating an idiot. You need a nobler hobby. Pick up a Bible, and get to know the Lord.

[Jet Jaguar]

Steve Dunham

Barry Dunham

Barry Soetoro

Barack Obama

Barack Hussein Obama

Barak Hussain Soetobakh

Soetobakh Dunham

Soetobakh Soetoro

Barry Soetoro

Soetoro Soetobakh

Barack Soebarkah

Barack Abdullah Hussein Obama

Please feel free to add your own finds.

And remember the document Obama signed that said he had never used an alias to apply to the Illinois Bar?

[Fred Nerks]

SOEBARKAH the name came from the documents in her passport file:

PASSPORT DOCUMENT LINK CLICK HERE

[NeverForgetBataan]

“And no one is going to stand up to us because if they do, we will unleash our base to riot and destroy your cities”
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Yep. Scott Walker is standing up to them and look what they are doing to him.

You will live this.

http://www.teapartytribune.com/2011/02/17/an-open-letter-to-the-children-of-wisconsin/

[presently no screen name]

Considering the fact that many dispute his sire and perhaps even his mother, then this State Department ruling would certainly have some bearing on the issue... a U.S. citizen if found in the United States

Wrong! That mean nothing, he has to be a natural born citizen

[Jet Jaguar]

[presently no screen name]

he Srelated how even the State Department couldn’t get the definition correct in their manual!

That is so amazing - I learned the defination in grammar school.

[redgolum]

If this is only coming to light now, then it is because Obama has reached the end of his usefulness to his controllers.

[presently no screen name]

If you go to drudge’s link on this subject, natural born is mentioned.

[SatinDoll]

Welcome to Free Republic, newbie!

I don’t what in Hell you mean by “there is confusion”.

The three types of citizenship I listed are legally recognized by our Federal government. These three were listed on Immigration and Naturalization Service’s website in 2008.

Homeland Security (in 2009) enfolded INS into its organization, and the page describing citizenship isn’t quite so clear as it once was but the three types can still be discerned.

Natural Born Citizen is not now, nor has it ever been, a type of citizenship. It is ONLY an eligibility requirement to be President per the U.S.Constitution.

Since you only joined FR this year, you missed all my lengthy disputations concerning the definition of Natural Born Citizen, which you’ve basically repeated in an abbreviated form on this thread.

Feel free to go back through my postings. You can find them through the “search” device in the upper right hand corner of any Forum page. Enter my handle, Satindoll, and then from the pull down menu choose “Users”.

[SatinDoll]

Obama’s mother, who incidentally naturalized as an Indonesian citizen but never surrendered her American passport, supposedly died in 1995.

I say supposedly because Lexus Nexus searches over the past three years keep turning up her name and multiple SSNs. She sometimes co-habits at the same addresses with other people named Obama and Michele Robinson. No joke.

[NeverForgetBataan]

If the SCOTUS were to find him ineligible... who effects his removal from office?

If he refused to leave it would be a constitutional crisis of the first order.

Would US Marshals simply have to go remove him?? Who would order them to do so. Holder? He was appointed by an ineligible president. So Holder should be out too.

Would that make Biden (an ineligible presidents choice) also ineligible to be VP. I hope so. He would be worse than
Obama.

[patriot08]

Multiple names, dozens of social security numbers..
what have we got sitting in our White House?

[patriot08]

_____________

Canada Free Press:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member
of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and
state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama
does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal
on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.

(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity
are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup.
The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated
only by political self-preservation.

(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because
they see that none of their leaders are doing
anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders
are NOT going to stop this thing.

JB Williams

[FrankR]

[bigoil]

If the Supreme Court were to rule that the Barry and Biden ticket was unqualified due to Barry’s Kenyan birthplace and that they are to vacate the White House and the Naval Observatory, then Presidents Carter and Clinton along with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton would ask for, at a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House, and receive, the resignations of Barry and Biden.

The only additional punishment would be a liftime permanent injunction which banns Barry and Biden from ever entering the District of Columbia again.

No criminal or civil charges would be pressed against either Barry or Biden.

Film at 11.

[devattel]

I don’t what in Hell you mean by “there is confusion”.

The three types of citizenship I listed are legally recognized by our Federal government. These three were listed on Immigration and Naturalization Service’s website in 2008.

Quite the contrary. Your analysis is thoroughly confusing.

Please go back and re-read the United States Constitution carefully. It defines the two distinct classifications of citizenship in the U.S. No more, no less.

First, Article II clearly states that you can either be a Citizen of the United States on September 17, 1787 OR a Natural Born Citizen. According to your logic, these two classifications in the citizenship clause are not interchangeable because the framing fathers were neophytes who didn't understand what a coordinating conjunction is, so they came up with a fourth requirement for the presidency with absolutely no purpose other than to confuse historians and agitate "birthers".

Second, neither the I.N.S. nor Congress can redefine these two classifications because the U.S. Constitution only grants Congress the authority to define universal naturalization statute. What you posted are technical types, or subsets of "Citizen of the United States" to make it convenient for the federal government to process immigrants. The 14th Amendment is quite clear on this matter. All "native born" means is that the child in question is born on U.S. soil and is therefore a Citizen of the United States. Elaborating on this is a self-defeating waste of time because every "Citizen of the United States" is equal in the eyes of the law, and that law is the Constitution of the United States.