Posted on 02/17/2011 8:31:53 PM PST by dalight
Drudge has linked this story from World Net Daily that notes the odd decision by the Supreme Court to hold a new “conference” on Obama’s eligibility to hold the presidency.
Let’s research WHY the court could be compelled to do this.
It MUST have something to do with the fact that Obama has no birth certificate on file in the Hawaiian Hall of Records with the name “Barack Hussein Obama” on it — since his original Hawaiian birth certificate with that name was sealed in the 1970s when he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, his stepfather. At the time of adoption, a child’s original birth certificate is sealed away and replaced in the Hall of Records by a new birth certificate that bears the adopted parents’ names and the child’s new name, if a new name is given.
This is what happened to Obama, when he was renamed “Soetobakh” by his mother and stepfather at the time of adoption.
(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...
.
devattel is a re-tread troll.
.
IF Obama was born in the USA, he MIGHT be a citizen, but he is NOT, as defined by the SCOTUS, an NBC.
Therefore, this is just an unfortunate situation that poor Mu-Barak 0h0m0llah has nothing to do with.
What about the "locked down tighter than Fort Knox" colleges, schools, Social Security Administration, etc. to hide invaders' records and among them, unfortunately, the biggest invader and highest-ranking illegal alien of all time, Barack Hussein Obama or insert name du jour!
This thesis is so lame; I have to give you an "F."
Professor S. Alinsky, Founding Father of All Theories
Thank you.
I spent an hour just hitting the back button and didn't get to 2009. Forget the printing.. it just takes too long to find anything that old if you are on some lists and post every once in a while.. it doesn't seem like much but going back a year of my posts takes forever and it will probably take 3 times this long to get back to that debate. There just has to be a better way. Arrg.
WOULD BE a Constitutional crisis?
There’s a Constitutional crisis going on right now. Unconstitutional “president”, unconstitutional edicts, laws, appointments, bills signed and so on.
There’s been one for years, it’s just coming to a head like a putrid boil.
“First can we quit using the incorrect term for what is in the Constitution.”
No.
Bluecat, firstly I thank you for your information. This is not a flame but just my response. I capitalize the whole phrase in my postings so it is not misconstrued by those who do not understand its significance in the U.S.Constitution. When reading that pertinent section, they see that one only needs be a citizen to serve as a Representative or Senator in Congress, and gloss-over the “natural born” before citizen in the eligibility requirement for President.
So I capitalize the whole phrase when posting - for clarity. I’m not intent here on writing a scholarly article for publication, just providing easily understandable information.
Cut me some slack, will ya’?
Why? Because there are those who’ve been on FR for a long period of time (and those who are fairly new) but haven’t been concerned about this issue. Now the subject interests them. They haven’t been investigating Obama intensely these past years since Feb.2008, like I have been doing. So I have grown accustomed to using what I know works in getting this very important message out — Obama isn’t eligible to be Prez.
Thank you for your input, as the information you provide is interesting and likely accurate, but next time try and provide an historical source that can be referenced online. Providing a book source is OK, too.
I don’t flame at all but there are those who’ll get REALLY nasty when statements are made without sources.
I’ll stick with the Ted Baxter thingy.
Thanks, ebysan, for the sources. I read numerous articles concerning Obama’s birth in Kenya from sources in Africa, and listened to a Chicago-are radio interview he gave years ago where he said he was born in Kenya.
All that information was wiped from my hard drives in April, 2008, when a hacker, operating from a Senate office building in Washington, D.C., broke into my computer.
Much valuable evidence has been wiped by Obamabots. They have also committed crimes while doing so. I reported the above to the FBI — they did nothing.
oh yes.. I agree... Completely.
Would you mind citing this troll behavior? As it stands right now I’m the only one fighting off the site “eligibility trolls” and they are dropping like flies and eating crow.
That is a disgrace that the FBI ignored your compaints of a Hacker from Senate Office from DC broke into your Computer & wiped your information from your hard drive in 2008
If we don’t STOP THEM this could happen to any of us Bloggers who are trying to put out information the Media will not report.
The Media is doing selective reporting...... Then they edit what they actually put out there.
I want OUR AMERICA back!!!!
I am so sick of this corruption!!
The Emperor Has No Clothes!!! No one has the Backbone to come forward &
challenge this Fraud of a POTUS!!!! Obama needs to be removed ASAP!! He
need to be charged with Treason against AMERICA & OUR CONSTITUTION!!!
devattel
Since Feb 6, 2011
devattel hasn’t created an about page.
And that meaning allows for alien parents, provided they are here “in amity” with our government.
~~~~~~~~~
Isn’t the proper terminology is “under the jurisdiction of?”
Was Barack Hussein Obama Sr. under the jurisdiction of the United States of America ?
16 Different Social Security Numbers
Private investigator Neil Sankey, using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Barack Obama’s name.
However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as: “Barak Obama,” “Batock Obama,” “Barok Obama,” and “Barrack Obama.” There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name. In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name.
Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided. Needless to say, there are also a slew of address and social security numbers connected to addresses in states that Obama has no known connection to.
In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042, and one starting 364.
In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999, which are not valid SSNs.
There are no addresses listed in New York where he attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485.
In Massachusetts — where Obama attended Harvard Law School — we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one.
Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as: 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office. This Social Security number began with 282 and was verified by the government in 2008.
This mystery grows even stranger as other addresses and Social Security numbers for Barack Obama appear in a dozen other states not known to be connected to him. Again, I am excluding those records names not spelled exactly like his name.
Tennessee, one address with a Social Security number beginning with 427
Colorado, one address, with a Social Security number beginning with 456.
Utah, two addresses, with two Social Security numbers beginning with 901 and 799.
Missouri has one address and one Social Security number beginning with 999.
Florida has two addresses listed for his him, three if you count one listed as “Barry Obama.” One is connected to a Social Security number beginning with 762.
In Georgia there are three addresses listed for him, all with different Social Security numbers: 579, 420, and 423.
In Texas there are four different addresses listed for him, one is connected to Social Security number 675.
There are two addresses listed for Barack Obama in Oregon and one address listed for him in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania.
All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled “Barack Obama.” In some cases, the middle initial “H” is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as: “Barac,” “Barak,” and “Barrack” Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.
Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.
Extracted from an article by Steve Baldwin. Read the whole thing here . . .
Susan Daniels, a second investigator filed an affidavit, with true and correct copies below, in the Barnett v. Obama case. Susan Daniels is a private investigator, licensed by the State of Ohio.
In her affidavit, Daniels states that she has located Barack Obama’s Social Security Number. She states it was issued between 1977 and 1979 in the State of Connecticut. She states that it is the only Social Security Number Barack Obama ever used.
The number assigned to Barack Obama “appears to be associated with someone born in the year 1890.”
http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/SocialSecurity.htm
~~ping~~
According to the Supreme Court, yes.
"II. The fundamental principle of the common law with regard to English nationality was birth within the allegiance, also called "ligealty," "obedience," "faith," or "power" of the King. The principle embraced all persons born within the King's allegiance and subject to his protection. Such allegiance and protection were mutual -- as expressed in the maxim protectio trahit subjectionem, et subjectio protectionem -- and were not restricted to natural-born subjects and naturalized subjects, or to those who had taken an oath of allegiance, but were predicable of aliens in amity so long as they were within the kingdom. Children, born in England, of such aliens were therefore natural-born subjects. But the children, born within the realm, of foreign ambassadors, or the children of alien enemies, born during and within their hostile occupation of part of the King's dominions, were not natural-born subjects because not born within the allegiance, the obedience, or the power, or, as would be said at this day, within the jurisdiction, of the King."
"It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.
III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established."
Since Obama Sr wasn't an invading army, nor an ambassador, he was "within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the" US Government.
Note the phrase "in amity" in my citation. That is as succinct as one can put the concept.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.