Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Rosapepe cited the committee's strengthening of a "conscience clause" intended to make clear that religious organizations and their affiliates do not have to participate in weddings or celebrations that violate their beliefs.

What about the citizens who do not want to fund the expense of adopting this lie that homosexual sex is valued by society absurdity? Do they get a tax payer conscience clause that prohibits their dollars paying any benefits or extending any financial privileges to homosexual sex partners that attain the state created homosexual sex practitioner certificate?

14 posted on 02/18/2011 5:01:24 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers

No.


15 posted on 02/18/2011 9:53:55 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson