[dblup]

Here’s a nod to you from Idaho.

The state legislators have been taking the usual abuse in the press, etc., because all the “authorities” claim that nullification is unconstitutional, obstructive, idiotic, moot.

Whatever. Screw ‘em anyway.

Dude, while I’m talking to you I have to say you’re carrying one of the most unusual, least enticing, nicknames I’ve seen on FR..heheh..what could be worse? “Billary’s Chancres” maybe?

Thanks for the shout out though....

[haroldeveryman]

“all the “authorities” claim that nullification is unconstitutional, obstructive, idiotic, moot.”

Not this nullification. Obamacare has already been declared unconstitutional.

[wmfights]

The state legislators have been taking the usual abuse in the press, etc., because all the “authorities” claim that nullification is unconstitutional, obstructive, idiotic, moot.

I believe the SCOTUS has ruled that Federal Law supersedes states rights.

However, even if this is true a couple things come into play. How do the Feds force a State to implement the law, especially if numerous States start passing the same nullification. Also, it opens the door for the threat of secession if the Fed pushes too hard disregarding the limitations on it in the Constitution.