Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob; schwingdoc
schwingdoc please accept my apologies. I haven't a clue how my earlier response ended up being posted as a reply to your post. It was intended for the poster living up to his namesake and I'll repost it to him/her/it now:
Since I haven't seen your name on these “statesrights” threads before I can only assume you are new to the discussion. What you are parroting is useless tripe that has been sliced and diced on these threads for at least two years. Based on what I've seen so far I seriously doubt you could anything to the discussion that hasn't been covered many times already. You're arguments are old hat and take on the tenor of a troll. JMO of course.
schwingdoc can stop scratching your head now. Once again, sorry.
104 posted on 02/16/2011 11:43:23 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

I have had no particular interest in “states” rights per se since I remember what that phrase meant while I was young. It was mainly a cover phrase used by Democrats in the South to fight extension or recognition of civil rights for all Americans.

The only “parroting” I see around here are misunderstandings of the constitution by self proclaimed experts using canned responses from ideological sites of little worth.

I’m sure anyone who doesn’t lower himself to your level of ignorance is considered a troll.


121 posted on 02/17/2011 1:09:13 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson