There isn't any proof of this, they merely correlate human activity with precipitation intensity, and with the models that were created to show things like intense storms - al-la Algore and Katrina.
Show me the programming and the data that went into it. I bet it's cooked.
THIS PROVES NOTHING.
[[Humans influence the intensity of precipitation extremes
There isn’t any proof of this,]]
Nor is there ANY evidence that someone walking past a smoker, inhaling a few particulates of smoke, is goign to develop cancer- or that IF the person gets cancer 40 years later, that it had ANYTHJING to do with walking past someone who smoked- but that didn’t stop lawmakers from making it illegal to smoke in crosswalks, parks, parking lots etc, and it won’t stop lawmakers from making it illegal to create carbon- proof means nothign to these folks-
I was in a hospital parking lot, having a smoke, and a ‘security guard’ stopped me and told me I couldn’t smoke in the lot- away from everyone- windy out etc- I felt like handing hte guard my extinguished cigarette butt, and saying “Tell ya what spanky- You keep that butt, and in 30-40 years IF someone here in the lot right now gets cancer from walking by and inhaling a few particulates from this cigarrette, and you can trace it to this ery cigarette, you give me a call, and I’ll pay their medical bills- but mind you- you’ll need PROOF that this cigarette was the cause of their cancer- keep the butt as evidence if youl ike”
I can understand not allowing smoking in resturaunts, bars etc where waiters and waitresses etc are forced to inhale concentrated clouds of smoke, but the antismoking self righteous nutcases are going WAY too far banning smoking in outdoor venues when there is absolutely NO proof that brief encounters with miniscule smoke particulates will lead to cancer- people are more apt to get cancer just from breathing car exhaust or aIR polution than from brief encoutners with smoke particulates.
as well, this report is blowing smoke out their butts- IF increased temperatures cause more precipitation, then EVERY SINGLE YEAR since the early 1950’s would have seen severe flooding the world over- but that’s NOT w2hat the evidence shows- many years showed draughts the world over- wildfires, etc-
I REALLY wish politicians and intellectually honest scientists would start flooding the media with evidenece that disproves these envirowhacko’s claims, showing htem to be the con artists that they really are, but nope- the cvoutnerevidence gets NO airtime, while hte envirowhackos get to spew their nonsense unimpeded and supported by agendist leftist media, and truth gets dumped in the gutter. FOX news should be takign hte lead in this issue- reporting the TRUTH EVERY single day to counter the constant droning by the agendists, and to get the TRUTH to the people- and politicians should be buying airtime to get the message out to the people so that we will be informed and will NOT allow our government to con us into massive taxes for a ‘crisis’ that is NOT infact a crisis or bnot infact mancaused.