Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beave Meister

I thought that earlier today, we read this was not true.


27 posted on 02/15/2011 2:33:53 PM PST by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FrogMom

Well, if it’s not true, it should be!!!

Since none of the slimestream media is reliable, who knows what’s true and what isn’t?

The Enq. has a lot of BS in it, but so do the others. The Enq. was right about John Edwards, they broke most of the OJ news during the trial and the follow-up analysis revealed that the Enq.’s reporting had the highest accuracy of all the media covering the story, including the L.A. Times and other sliemstream media. They also had the Tiger Woods stories rights, among many others.

So when I read that USA Today says they checked on the Enq. story and say it’s a hoax, who knows? Maybe the prison PIO doesn’t like USA Today. Maybe OJ got a beat-down but he’s not damaged for life. In other words, I don’t think USA Today trumps the Enq.. USA Today has written plenty of pro-obastard propaganda itself and are not above....shall we say......journalistic error?


47 posted on 02/15/2011 3:14:08 PM PST by ratsreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson