Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FightThePower!
Don't argue semantics with me. We responded to an initiation of force. Congress gave the President all the authority he required under law.

Anything else is just namby-pamby BS thrown up by anti-war douche-bags because the legislation didn't have the word "declare" right in front of the word "war".

If you want to argue that the War Powers Act is itself unConstitutional, then we can find agreement. To say stomping on a Dictator was somehow "wrong" because you didn't like the wording is idiotic.

92 posted on 02/16/2011 5:33:39 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III%. The last line in the sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse

I do think the War Powers Act is un-Constitutional.

“Stomping on a Dictator” sure was fun to watch on TV. Its too bad my son had his legs blown off so that so we could “Stomp on a Dictator”. We should definitely do more of that.


93 posted on 02/16/2011 7:06:33 AM PST by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson