Skip to comments.
Gates, Rumsfeld Sued Over U.S. Military's Rape Epidemic
Yahoo News ^
| 15Feb2011
| Jesse Ellison
Posted on 02/15/2011 8:17:11 AM PST by ConorMacNessa
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Louis Foxwell
Uniformed ladies are fair game for the troops,Are you serious? Really?
Think that attitude would fly in any corporation?
What an idiot.
41
posted on
02/15/2011 9:13:04 AM PST
by
Wizdum
(Wisdom is what you gain when things go wrong.)
To: Louis Foxwell
Really, supporting the rape of servicewomen? That is contemptible.
42
posted on
02/15/2011 9:15:14 AM PST
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Trailerpark Badass
Imagine the environment in a unit with homo commanders & sncos.
Someone else said it - we ain’t seen nothing yet...
43
posted on
02/15/2011 9:19:07 AM PST
by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: ConorMacNessa
There is, of course, a fairly easy way to fix this. It’s just not politically correct, so won’t be done.
44
posted on
02/15/2011 9:23:46 AM PST
by
chesley
(Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
To: ConorMacNessa
If men took pride in being a “gentleman”, and women took pride in being a “lady”, there would be a lot less of this stuff going on.
45
posted on
02/15/2011 9:25:50 AM PST
by
Sergio
(An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
To: ConorMacNessa
Just another argument to return to a traditional, non-socially-engineered military - strictly honorable men under arms. And those rapists and abusers should be drummed out. If that’s how they treat American woman, they shouldn’t be anywhere near foreign civilian women in a war who at some point might be dependent on American forces.
46
posted on
02/15/2011 9:34:39 AM PST
by
OldNewYork
(social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
To: Doc Savage
Indeed “Can’t pass the smell test”.She had a gun and was trained how to fight and she didn’t make out a report about it?
47
posted on
02/15/2011 9:40:01 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: Eva
Ive heard allegations of rape threat by lesbians on straight women. I guess I'm just naive, but I just can't understand the... uh, mechanics of a lesbian rape of another women. Is there.. uh, extra hardware involved?
48
posted on
02/15/2011 9:57:21 AM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
(Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
To: rahbert
Wheres the discipline? In WWII there would be courts martial and the noose for rape.
There is no excuse for this. Warrior ethic, my foot. These are not warriors picking on their female counterparts. These are horndogs with no sense of honor.
Well said. All the justifies and apologists on this thread make me sick. A soldier that can't treat a comrade with respect needs a NOOSE, not an excuse.
49
posted on
02/15/2011 10:03:44 AM PST
by
TalonDJ
To: ConorMacNessa
If our government, and therefore our military, was not controlled by Globalist Banksters and Cultural Marxists women would not be in the military and rape would be a capital crime. As it is now our military is used as a social engineering experiment and to protect the borders of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq while our own borders are wide open allowing illegal aliens to kill more Americans then any Muslim terrorist ever did.
50
posted on
02/15/2011 10:11:18 AM PST
by
Roninf5-1
(If ignorance is bliss why are so many Americans on anti-depressants?)
To: ConorMacNessa
LMAO, what did they expect?
Now they are going to put women in submarines.
I have a niece in the Air Force, she is a bitch and a Dyke.
covered with tattoo’s.
I don’t think she is a whore.
51
posted on
02/15/2011 10:20:10 AM PST
by
Venturer
To: Straight Vermonter
Guess that went right over your head. Supporting the exclusion of women in military combat forces is more to the point.
52
posted on
02/15/2011 10:23:52 AM PST
by
Louis Foxwell
(For love of Sarah, our country and the American Way of Life.)
To: backwoods-engineer
Extra hardware would be the right term, I guess.
53
posted on
02/15/2011 10:47:26 AM PST
by
Eva
To: Christian Engineer Mass
They build up warrior men, then expect them to be docile little puppies around women.Yes, that seems like backwards thinking. Especially when some female troops hit the bar after work and get $ - - - faced drunk. I've witnessed that firsthand, and had to have a fellow female designated driver take the drunk women home.
One got so drunk one night at a topless bar, she jumped up, pulled her top off and showed the not so well endowed dancer what breasts look like. The bouncer told us to get her and ourselves out of there.
54
posted on
02/15/2011 11:15:50 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(America has two cancers - democrats and RINOS.)
To: Louis Foxwell
No, I read and understood what you wrote. Anyone who supports the rape of US servicewomen by US servicemen has issues.
55
posted on
02/15/2011 11:22:30 AM PST
by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Straight Vermonter
It is not supporting it. It is stating a fact. War brings out a very animalistic side in men. That's why we in the military have to work so hard to instill discipline in our Soldiers to insure they follow the laws of war.
Once you have killed a man or had someone try to kill you rape does not seem like such a big deal. For most of human history when one army conquered another army the raping and pillaging started soon after.
I think for men there is a connection between violence and libido. I would have not thought that until my first deployment and experience it myself. I did not rape anyone but after a firefight there was a strong urge to procreate. Talking to other Soldiers this seems to be common.
Comment #57 Removed by Moderator
To: Jeff Chandler
Is this a news article? It reads like an introduction to Womyns Studies 101. "Jesse Ellison is a writer and editor for Newsweek..."
'Nuff said ?
58
posted on
02/15/2011 12:31:23 PM PST
by
jimt
To: starlifter
Few people know me better than myself. You are not one of them.
59
posted on
02/15/2011 2:18:46 PM PST
by
Louis Foxwell
(For love of Sarah, our country and the American Way of Life.)
To: thulldud; TankerKC
The word is "infinitesimally", and it doesn't mean "a whole lot more"; it means "practically no more at all."Thanks for a good catch. See? It taxed my memory. LOL!!
60
posted on
02/15/2011 2:39:57 PM PST
by
Albion Wilde
(Government does nothing as economically as the private sector. - Ronald Reagan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson