I thought the whole point of private accounts was that one could will them to whomever one wants.
Are we to change estate law to say that one can will one’s property anywhere, except to one that one has buggerred?
Homosexuals can leave their money and property to whomever they please now. They can also get power of attorney so their "friend" can speak for them. What they WANT is to make peopel recognize a "marriage" . And they are trying to use the force of government to do it.
Anyone can leave private property to anyone they choose. That is yet another matter not in dispute.
What is very much in dispute is the question of whether benefits that flow to a spouse must also flow to a homosexual partner. Should it be unlawful for an employer or the government to pay survivors benefits to a spouse and not to any other kind of partner? Making it so means using government power to force us all accept homosexual relationships and allocate funds accordingly. It would be the antithesis of limited government. This really isn’t rocket science.