Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter

I generally agree. Here’s my observation about this particular issue:

There are no homosexual conservatives. HOWEVER, there ARE homosexuals with right-leaning tendencies.

What I mean by this is that our operational definition of conservatism is a school of thought that does not support or allow for homosexuality. In practice, though, there are homosexuals who have some ideas that are similar to what conservatives believe and want.

I have homosexual friends who would prefer less government involvement, fiscal responsibility, a reduction in federal mandates, and a host of other concerns that are similar to my own.

That does not make them conservative, though, as they believe in and practice something that is antithetical to one of the bedrock principles of conservatism. I do not and will not approve of their homosexuality, but I am glad they believe in at least some of the things I do. Better they’re on our side on those issues than the side of the progressives. If only they would VOTE.

But they should NEVER be counted as the face of the conservative movement, because when it comes to PRACTICE, they do not perpetuate the conservative movement.


7 posted on 02/14/2011 8:01:36 AM PST by HushTX (If the best defense is a good offense, it's a good thing I'm really offensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: HushTX
IMO any time a person uses an adjective to qualify their conservatism (in a political/public sense) they are implying that government, or the public, has some sort of obligation or role related to that adjective that no true conservative believes they should have.

Anyone who truly shares the basic tenents of conservatism without qualification is a welcome vote, private lives aside.

21 posted on 02/14/2011 8:17:30 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: HushTX
"But they should NEVER be counted as the face of the conservative movement, because when it comes to PRACTICE, they do not perpetuate the conservative movement."

When it comes to practice, all they perpetuate is sin, HIV and a host of other STDs, suicides, alcohol and drug abuse, partner abuse, an aggressive agenda to teach their filth to our children as "sex ed", a desire to destroy the institution of marriage by co-habiting and demanding society call them 'married', take our tax dollars to research the disease they created and perpetuate..AIDS, and I could go on and on. Who on earth would want to call these twisted, vile people "friends"? Simply because they want to live in a economically sound country doesn't mean they have 'conservative leanings', it just means they're perverts who want to live in comfort.

Unfortunately, the term "conservative" has bastardized itself into the realm of economics, of which is it has nothing to do with. It's just another sleazy way for liberals and progressives to put up a facade. "I'm a raving sexual deviate, but I want less government and less spending, (just so long as they don't spend less on AIDS), so I'm a conservative". barf

26 posted on 02/14/2011 8:21:36 AM PST by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: HushTX
I have homosexual friends who would prefer less government involvement, fiscal responsibility, a reduction in federal mandates, and a host of other concerns that are similar to my own. That does not make them conservative, though, as they believe in and practice something that is antithetical to one of the bedrock principles of conservatism.

Just curious. Which bedrock principles of conservatism?

196 posted on 02/14/2011 1:41:35 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson