[Daveinyork]

Until we succeed in getting smaller government, those of us who want smaller government had better quit this sniping at each other, or we will have larger government and no freedom. Either we hang together, or we hang separately.

[muawiyah]

Then you don't want GOProud hanging around. The current ambition is for the government to protect the gays from criticism and that requires BIG GOVERNMENT ~ big abusive government to be specific.

So, no thanks, the gay crowd are not willing to go along with all the demands "smaller government" places on them.

[DJ MacWoW]

They don't need a sexual identity group in order to vote. They need it to push their agenda. And their agenda is NOT Conservative.

[fwdude]

Until we succeed in getting smaller government, those of us who want smaller government had better quit this sniping at each other, or we will have larger government and no freedom. Either we hang together, or we hang separately.

You make the breathtakingly false assumption that GOProud is a group of conservatives. They are not. Allow infiltration of alleged "fiscal conservatives" like this, and you will have blatant, total Leftism in the end.

"Conservatism" can't be parsed. Either you are conservative in all areas, or the word has no real meaning.

[Prokopton]

Until we succeed in getting smaller government, those of us who want smaller government had better quit this sniping at each other, or we will have larger government and no freedom. Either we hang together, or we hang separately.

If homosexuals believe in smaller government, they can vote with candidates who also believe in smaller government whether those candidates believe in the homosexual agenda or not. If they believe in smaller government but want to vote for big government liberals because they support the homosexual agenda, then that's their prerogative. It begs the question, however, of whether they are really "conservatives".