Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Siena Dreaming
<>This was at one point of time early in his tenure.

No it wasn't. He was running for a second term. That's hardly early. And he CRUSHED. Then he did something no one had done. He ran for a third term. The results?

Popular vote was 54-44. Electoral was 449-82 (84%-15%). Still massive. But wait! There's still more!

His 4th election...53-45 popular. Electoral 432-99.(81%-18%) Another massive landslide.

I'm not trying to defend the guy. I don't like him. But the guy was MASSIVELY popular. In terms of electoral politics, he's Babe Ruth. No one is better.

18 posted on 02/13/2011 8:36:40 AM PST by Huck (one per-center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
No it wasn't. He was running for a second term. That's hardly early

It was early if you consider how many terms he had.

I would be curious to know if he had those numbers later; my suspicion is he did not (though I would be open to be proven wrong, of course).

My suspicion is that the Democrats saw those numbers and pulled out all the stops in their propganda machine, never looking back.

24 posted on 02/13/2011 8:44:38 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

A factor in these landslides was the iron grip over the media. Editors who tried to speak ‘Truth to Power’ found themselves in the bread lines. Today we have numerous media outlets that can and do find the truth.


30 posted on 02/13/2011 8:52:24 AM PST by Traveler59 (Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson