Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

I agree with you 100%. I don’t understand the process the states must follow. They can make a law but can Obambo declare it void by Presidential Order? Can it be appealled by the President or any Federal officials? If so, does the law take effect while waiting appeal? How long does it take to get these laws passed and enacted? Just a few questions thatyou and other Freepers can help me with. I live in a Blue state and nobody would lift a finger to discuss Obambo.


8 posted on 02/12/2011 8:52:37 AM PST by DrDude (Focused like a LASER on creating jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DrDude

>I don’t understand the process the states must follow. <

I haven’t gone through the entire thread to see if you got a better answer, but I will explain it as I understand it.

Each state has a person who is in charge of certifying the candidate as eligible. each state has it’s own process that they are supposed to follow.

The president has no authority over the state as to how they process their information. The information must conform to the constitution but may be amended by the state to be more stringent in gathering the data.
Again, the president has NO authority in this matter.

If a candidate is found to be ineligible they are taken off the ballot - the election continues as scheduled despite any court cases that begin as a result of the decision.
the state courts try to expedite the matter so that if a candidate is to be reinstated s/he can be put back on the ballot in time for th election.

Now, I am going to blow your mind.

Did you know that a case in my state .. one of the bluest of them all

Strunk v Paterson (Obama): First time in the USA since 1824; Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is; Concludes Obama is not a NBC.

yep, it’s true. Didn’t make the news, but here it is:
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/363/827/Strunk_v_Paterson_Obama_:_First_time_in_the_USA_since_1824%3B_Judge_has_opined_on_what_Natural_Born_citizen_is%3B_Concludes_Obama_is_not_a_NBC..html

court papers are there as well.

I’ll BET MONEY that they allow him back on the ballot again though!


104 posted on 03/02/2011 5:35:27 AM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
"They can make a law but can Obambo declare it void by Presidential Order?"

The States are sovereign. The Feds cannot enact or affect legislation within a state except by legal challenge, such as is the case with the Arizona border enforcement laws. This means that a state can pass any sort of legislation it wants and only a Constitutional challenge can erase it.

Here's a law I would recommend each state enact. It would END everything we are discussing immediately.

Usurper Detection Legislation Should Be Passed within Each State

120 posted on 03/04/2011 11:21:22 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
Presidential orders are not binding on the States. Presidential orders ONLY apply to the Executive Branch of the Federal Government.
122 posted on 03/31/2011 6:44:56 PM PDT by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson