“And isn’t it interesting that she drove all the way home that drunk without incident, only to crash and burn in her own garage.”
Remember Hitchcock’s North by Northwest? The bad guys wanted Cary Grant’s character to appear to have driven off a dangerous road while drunk. They simply held him and poured liquor down his throat. Having been intubeated, I can tell you it takes only a few seconds to put a tube down your throat and then there’d be no way to resist. The perps would then have all the time in the world to make sure the scene reflected what they wanted it to reflect.
Now, having stated this, if you want to prove someone (individual) committed a murder you have to show they had means, motive, opportunity. We have everything but a suspect and a motive. So, conspiracy theorists, who is the suspect and what’s his motive? It can’t be that she’s seen the actual birth certificate. Us crackpot birthers have been discredited to the point that even when it shows up, it won’t matter.
Who did the deed? It’s too clean for a typical Chicago style hit. (You can spot them, they use an extra thick crust on the concrete shoes, called locally, deep barrel overshoes.) It would be downright foolish to use the CIA, as whoever does it would make a video and later write a best selling book. You can picture them testifying in front of Congress wearing a crisp military uniform and saying things like; “Obama loves my @ss.”
It could be a subcontractor. Do you think they issued a Request For Proposals? More importantly, did they go with the low bidder?
What could she have known in her line of work that could have wrecked someone big? Or was her hubby getting tired of her? Was she having an affair? Was her hubby having an affair? Who was she a lobbyist for?