Chris Matthews Rants: The 'Tea-Bag' Conservatives Don't Get Complexity of Egypt Crisis

Nation.Foxnews.Com ^ | February 10, 2011 | By Tingles

[Psalm 144]

“I’d hate to be the one that has to clean up all the spittle after each Hardball show. That would make for a great Dirty Jobs episode.”

Not just spittle I wager. I would not want to look under the bench after Matthews’ “tingling legs” episodes.

[Huebolt]

Thanks MIKE WALLACE for getting Anwar Sadat ASSASSINATED

That is very scary.

The lying dinosaur media needs to DIE asap. A boycott of sponsors is the ticket. ABCNNBCBS are cancer.

Mathews is the little shit-eating dog the Russians say "Barks and barks, but the caravan moves on."

[CommerceComet]

At least we know the Egypt situation isn’t very complicated if Chris Matthews has it figured out.

[RatRipper]

Hissy doesn’t get the simplicity of the risky side of this situation:

several dirtbag factions trying to turn the government of Egypt into a dictatorship favoring themselves

It is Hissy and his band of myopic leftists that do not understand the intricacies and time it takes to develop a REAL democracy, if one can exist at all in a Muslim country.

[MortMan]

Maybe we could start calling Chrissie “Douche Party” to illustrate his error?

[NavyCanDo]

Nobody understands the complexity of this better than those on the Right. We understand the plight of the Egyptian people and are sympathetic to those wanting to free themselves of the repressive government run by a dictator who has more money than Bill Gates – but we also understand that power vacuums in the Middle East , almost always result in very bad things happening.

[Carley]

christingles is so firmly in the cuckoo’s nest that he has rendered himself irrelevant.

IMHO, this is a very good thing.

[Cheetahcat]

How about You Douche Bag Chrissie,FYI Some of us have lived in the Middle east and understand the Arab Street better than you and your Hyenas ever will.

[Semper Mark]

Here you go, Ann -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1fzFNsu15U

[Oratam]

"Too complex" is a liberal canard meant to keep decision making in the hands of the elite.

f u Chris.

[Houghton M.]

To quote Henry II: Will no one rid us of this goofball?

[Recovering_Democrat]

Chrissy Matthews doesn't know what she is talking about. Ignore her.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Barry and his Braintrust are the only ones who don’t seem to grasp the complexity here

[Buckeye McFrog]

Barry and his Braintrust are the only ones who don’t seem to grasp the complexity here

[rockrr]

Corksoakers like crissy must think that babbling incoherently and offering up insulting and contradictory demands is an effective foreign policy.

It must be that illusive mythological nuance I keep hearing about.

[KEmom]

thanks for sharing that clip... unbelievable, not only to be interviewing Khomeini but emphasize what Sadat said about him...truly appalling.

[Hotlanta Mike]

OBAMA, SOROS AND THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/02/11/reelection-slogan-for-obama-co-we-bring-down-governments/

[FroggyTheGremlim]

"definition of insanity, doing the something over and over and expecting a different result."

I know that phrase is used over and over. But I want to challenge it.

Would you claim that someone who buys a lottery ticket every Saturday hoping to win is insane?

Would you claim that someone who throws a bowling ball down the alley, hoping for a strike and a perfect game is insane?

I could come up with many examples of people acting out of hope who are not insane.

[Arrowhead1952]

"....nobody takes Chris Matthews seriously.

If FR quit talking about Mr Tingles, he would get no attention at all.

[aruanan]

Would you claim that someone who buys a lottery ticket every Saturday hoping to win is insane?

Would you claim that someone who throws a bowling ball down the alley, hoping for a strike and a perfect game is insane?

I could come up with many examples of people acting out of hope who are not insane.

Your examples are defective. The outcome of the lottery does not depend on the action of doing the same thing and/or playing the same number repeatedly. The outcome of "throw[ing] a bowling ball down the alley" doesn't depend on the general description of "throw[ing] a bowling ball down the alley" but on specific differences between each and every throw.

You also failed to note that whereas the definition you employed to begin with was "doing the something [sic] over and over and expecting a different result" the example you gave in bowling was doing the same thing in hope of achieving the identical thing (a strike) each time. You can't get more fundamentally different than that.