Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scanian; All

I understand your disdain for the term “Birther”...as it was foisted upon those who have doubts about Obama’s “Inaccurate Conception”, a term used by the Obama Supporters (MSNBC and FoxNews).

I use the term Birther as it is easier to write...I guess I am not as offended with the term.

I am more offended by the so-called “conservatives” who have supported and aided Obama by attacking Birthers and those who ask for the truth.....I am referring to people like Ann Coulter, Andrew Brokeback, Glenn Beck, and a few others.

Those who attack the people asking the questions about Obama’s Inaccurate Conception are just helping Obama for 2012. Just think, without the attacks....we may never have had ObamaCare passed....a Democrat minority in both House and Senate....State governments gone even more conservative....as Obama would have been politically crippled by now.

Those phony conservatives who attack those asking about Obama’s background have been the biggest boost to the Democrat party.


6 posted on 02/11/2011 3:26:53 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Newt Gingrich and Chris Matthews: Seperated at Birth??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: UCFRoadWarrior

“Doubter” is just as short...and it was not “birthed” on DU.

The trick was to link documenters with 9-11 truthers which makes it even more insulting.


8 posted on 02/11/2011 3:30:40 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
I am more offended by the so-called “conservatives” who have supported and aided Obama by attacking Birthers and those who ask for the truth.....I am referring to people like Ann Coulter, Andrew Brokeback, Glenn Beck, and a few others.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The American Thinker was among this group that ignored Obama’s eligibility. I am pleased though that they are finally giving it some coverage.

28 posted on 02/11/2011 9:08:35 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: UCFRoadWarrior; Scanian; Red Badger
There is massive cognitive dissonance afoot in the land. It is quite simply driving us all ... or maybe just me ... nuts.

Barack Hussein Obama, Jr is clearly ineligible to have presented himself as a candidate for POTUS according to the accepted, traditional, or even customary American view of Article II of the Constitution.

But, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. did present himself as a candidate. He was placed on the ballot of all 50 states. He was elected by a 53% popular vote plurality. He was elected by The electoral college. He was sworn in by the CJ, twice. He is, ineligibility and all, the sitting POTUS.

The case has been brought before the courts innumerable times by now, and with the exception of the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana, has not yet been heard on its merits. BTW The Indiana Supremes ruled he WAS a Natural Born citizen.

Bottom line: We cannot get Obama out. We may be able to keep him from running again in 2012 if one state legislature is able to get one state AG to do his job by making documentation of eligibility mandatory by statute, prior to gaining access to the ballot. This power ALREADY resides at this level, but has not been exercised. Hence, the perceived need for laws to make exercising the power mandatory. In the meantime, an ineligible man is POTUS. That which should not be, is.

Cognitive dissonance: "an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding conflicting ideas simultaneously."

37 posted on 02/12/2011 11:24:57 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Man up, Mubarak ... you're Air Force and you done OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: UCFRoadWarrior; Scanian
I am not offended either. It makes it easy to say, "We are all Birthers now" Whenever someone like Chris Matthews comes out and calls for Obama to release the BC. I am more offended with the therm "Liberal". To me, that is a hideous mis-use of the language. Leftist/"Progressive"/communist/socialist/marxist/facist/big government types have nothing to do with LIBERTY. Liberal is a term we should stop using immediately. It also confuses the drug addled Hollywood types who think they are Liberals but really only want the drug legalization promoted by Libertarians.
40 posted on 02/13/2011 6:43:51 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson