Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not good enough: Tea Party freshmen sink GOP spending plan
The Hill ^ | 2/10/11 | Erik Wasson

Posted on 02/11/2011 1:57:04 AM PST by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
‘No, I committed to cutting $100 billion’

It may take another election cycle to get rid of the RINOs.

1 posted on 02/11/2011 1:57:09 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“For me it’s painful ... I have to deal with labor, it’s job training; with health, it’s community health centers; with education, it’s kids,” he said. “Mine is a painful process to find the savings necessary.”

. . .

He’s making it more complicated than it needs to be. These are issues the states should be handling, not the federal government.


2 posted on 02/11/2011 2:05:25 AM PST by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
It may take another election cycle to get rid of the RINOs.

It's an ongoing process and is fought continually. In 1964 it was Goldwater vs Rockefeller. In 1976 it was Ford vs Reagan. The RINO/CountryClub/Rockefeller wing of the GOP is always hovering in the background.

3 posted on 02/11/2011 2:06:21 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Keeping promises has not been a stong point of RINOS. They need to be bitch slapped if anything meaningful is to take place.


4 posted on 02/11/2011 2:11:57 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Didn’t Bachmann elude to nearly half a trillion in cuts?

SHE IS HERE!!!


5 posted on 02/11/2011 2:14:45 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Get rid of the scanners and stop buying more of them. That way you will also avoid all those cataract operations that Medicare would have to pay for.


6 posted on 02/11/2011 2:21:27 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

“The RINO/CountryClub/Rockefeller wing of the GOP is always hovering in the background.”
***
Guilty rich people who make themselves feel good by stealing from the middle class and spending the loot “for the children,” “for the environment,” “for the future,” etc.


7 posted on 02/11/2011 2:37:27 AM PST by peyton randolph (How's that hopey dopey changey thing working out for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

>>For example, a deeper cut could be achieved by using current spending levels rather than an Obama 2011 budget never enacted. <<

Why are they using a bloated budget as a base? Simply use 2006 spending - when RATs took control - as the base. And don’t refer to no increases as cuts. Unless this is a snow job, something Versailles on the Potomac is really good at.


8 posted on 02/11/2011 3:18:16 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All

Huge political win by the Tea Party....now, the Liberal RINO establishment knows they have to tow the line with the Tea Party...not vice versa

A bigger story than is being reported. Of course, the Liberal Media and the Liberal RINO Media (FoxNews) will downplay this.....


9 posted on 02/11/2011 3:34:22 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Newt Gingrich and Chris Matthews: Seperated at Birth??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
or do I do more damage to myself not voting for $100 billion in spending?

Another symptom of business as usual. It's not about them, it's about America. Any politician who worries about himself instead of the job they are supposed to do is part of the problem, not the solution.

So what this is, is a period of adjustment where the new people explain by action what the current leadership will need to do. Just because it gets whipped up by partisan hack media types who want to promote their agenda at the expense of the country does not mean it's a power struggle or an unraveling of the majority.

10 posted on 02/11/2011 3:39:45 AM PST by Bernard (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, Three if by Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

What they need to do is completely eliminate the freaking EPA.

It does NOTHING good for America. Bring back DDT, shoot the spotted owls and snail darters, close up shop!


11 posted on 02/11/2011 3:48:01 AM PST by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Only $100 billion? What kind of joke is that? It needs to be multiple trillions. Entire departments.


12 posted on 02/11/2011 3:50:30 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

If Ryan is a Fiscal Hawk we are in worse trouble than I thought.


13 posted on 02/11/2011 4:03:23 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz
Only $100 billion? What kind of joke is that? It needs to be multiple trillions. Entire departments.

Exactly. Our leaders are cowards...

14 posted on 02/11/2011 4:05:13 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

Faux News. The New RINO Media channel.


15 posted on 02/11/2011 4:06:26 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

But, but, butt, what would that do to the unemployment numbers?


16 posted on 02/11/2011 4:19:45 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Start cutting by disbanding the EPA.
That ought to be worth a few hundred billion to start with.


17 posted on 02/11/2011 4:20:08 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Re-Elect President Sarah Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I like the general direction I’m seeing here.


18 posted on 02/11/2011 4:21:21 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Agree completely.

Our government borrows 40 cents of every dollar it spends. This means that we have to cut actual spending by 40% - over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS - just to get back to break-even spending.

The Republican leadership is struggling to find ONE TENTH the amount of cuts needed?!

They simply are not taking this (or us) seriously.

I have a new litmus test politicians: the only way I will take anyone seriously is if he or she immediately writes and submits a bill for across-the-board federal spending cuts amounting to 40% or > $1 trillion.


19 posted on 02/11/2011 4:24:26 AM PST by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Go michelle Bachman, it is time to get radical if we want to emerge on top at all,,,we need to shut down whole depaartments of government....5 trillion sounds like a start..


20 posted on 02/11/2011 4:28:32 AM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson