[Tribune7]

"No, we're not giving cover to bigots," he

I think it's safe to say that anybody who hates the concept of recognizing that marriage is only for heterosexuals is a bigot.

If homosexuals want to work with us because we are willing to respect their private lives, they certainly should because we do.

Some of Grover Norquist's other friends, however, . . .

And why does Breitbart think anal sex is something that shouldn't be at the very least discouraged?

[Earthdweller]

"No, we're not giving cover to bigots,"

They will not reason the concept that marriage is exclusively a biblical created state, they cannot reason that changing the meaning voids and discredits the bible as a whole and they dare not reason what would happen if the meaning of marriage could be opened to the joining of any and all men or beasts.

He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; and he that dares not reason is a slave.

[jimt]

I think it's safe to say that anybody who hates the concept of recognizing that marriage is only for heterosexuals is a bigot.

The expect us to play "Let's pretend" with them, and get very hissy if we don't.