What I like is allowing the free exchange of ideas, even if I don't agree with those ideas. That's one reason I enjoy FR. There are plenty of people that don't agree with me all the time, but I'd never ask Jim to toss 'em.
The owner disagrees. We have no obligation to allow dissent a platform on FR.
Who reads FR? How many accounts on FR? What does FR stand for? Where is FR going?
As an organization, we cannot be both for and against homosexuality, abortion, big government, border and national security, etc. I don't know about others, but if we must choose, I choose to be on the right side of each and every issue. Why should FR use its limited resources to allow liberals, homosexualists, abortionists, big spenders, big taxers, big government solutions advocates, gun grabbers, pacifists, isolationists, environmentalists, open-borders lobbyists, etc, ply their trade on FR? Well, more and more lately, we don't. And, apparently, that has pissed off a lot of big tent, true blue RINO types and the herd is stampeding. Let them go.