Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HappyWarrior2012
Difference between Daniels and Palin, no ONE questions Palin’s social conservatism

I certainly am after she embraced GOProud being a part of CPAC. And, let's keep in mind, Palin's first veto as governor was of a bill that would block state benefits to partners of homosexuals. She has no problem with the morning-after pill being legal and supports taxpayer funding for abortion in the cases of rape.

Combine that with her miserable approval numbers and poll numbers against Obama, I'll definitely take Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain or Jim DeMint over her.

225 posted on 02/10/2011 9:56:37 AM PST by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky

What a hypocrite, you will take Bachmann or Cain over Sarah? Bachmann and Cain are SPEAKING at CPAC.

By your definition, showing up is endorsing GoProud. So Bachmann and Cain are completely fine with letting GoProud have a seat at the table and chance to speak.

Sarah isn’t attending and never has. That alone should tell you she doesn’t value the direction CPAC has taken. If she isn’t there then she probably could care less about who is or isn’t. Her attitude is probably, Sure GoProud should be able to talk, I’m not there, what do I care?

To stay intellectually honest, DeMint is your only choice. No other candidate will do without making you a hypocrite.


260 posted on 02/10/2011 10:28:25 AM PST by HappyWarrior2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson