Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA

The actual proposal is to cut $58 billion in non-defense spending from Obama’s 2011 budget proposal.

The GOP originally promised $100 Billion in cuts. I’m not sure where you get the $32 Billion, but that’s $10 Billion short of what ADDITIONALLY needs to be cut, and that’s the reason for Flake’s non-cooperation. He wants an ADDITIONAL $42 Billion trimmed from the budget.


15 posted on 02/09/2011 8:40:47 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

$32 billion is the number Hugh Hewitt is using:

http://www.hughhewitt.com/blog/


17 posted on 02/09/2011 8:42:37 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Apparently this is coming from Ryan himself.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=41686

Question is where did the $58 billion number come from?


18 posted on 02/09/2011 8:46:11 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; DManA

They should eliminate cabinet departments that violate the 10th Amendment, HUD, Education, HHS, Energy, and Transportation. They should eliminate federal welfare spending, including food stamps, unemployment benefits, and TANF. Each state government should take care of the welfare needs of its residents. All of these cuts would save about 40%. Since the federal government would need less money, Congress would pass an across-the-board 40% income tax rate cut.


22 posted on 02/09/2011 8:49:10 AM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson