Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 556x45

no arguments, but Id’ keep NASA. a mars landing would be a real shot in the arm for our national prestige, and it will result development of new, better technology in a whole lot of areas.


12 posted on 02/09/2011 8:35:03 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: camle

Zero out NASA I say. They are worse than wasting their budget “educating” our children about the dangers of man made CO2.

http://climate.nasa.gov/kids/


16 posted on 02/09/2011 8:40:50 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: camle

At what cost?

I like NASA, but fiscal accountability must come first.

The cuts have to be made.


20 posted on 02/09/2011 8:47:02 AM PST by BenKenobi (one of the worst mistakes anybody can make is to bet against Americans.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: camle

The reason I included NASA is b/c its almost completely ineffective. The PC drivel side lines it resources and focus. I think the mission would be better handled by private enterprise. America can do so much better than NASA is producing.


31 posted on 02/09/2011 9:19:53 AM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson