[muawiyah]

The solution to the question of lack of burning inside the vehicle YET she was burned. Let's say we have just enough ethylene glycol mist inside the compartment to ignite. It does so explosively. She and her clothing burn. The fire retardant in the upholstery, headers and other combustible materials in the interior works so none of that catches fire in that brief, but intense, explosive combustion.

Oh, yeah, and the explosion creates the evidence of BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA ~ you do get beat up pretty badly when you are "exploded" on by something.

[DBrow]

Plausible.

Also plausible is bad reporting a month or so ago, the reporter did not get the facts right. GIGO, Garbage In, Gospel Out for many news outlets.

Burned car, body, so he writes that the body was burned without checking.

[Gabrial]

“Oh, yeah, and the explosion creates the evidence of BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA ~ you do get beat up pretty badly when you are “exploded” on by something.”

This is the piece that is still not sitting well with me. I can't find any evidence that vapors from e-glychol are volatile enough to explode like gasoline vapors. Burn yes, explode? - hmmmmm

Someone who looked nothing like me once took two buckets and two foil pie tins and put an inch of gas in one tin and and inch of undiluted e-glychol in the other and duct taped a bucket over each pie tin with the end of a 10 foot length on cannon fuse poking up on the inside of each of the buckets and let both sit overnight.

As luck would have it, the next morning some unrestrained youth lit both fuses.

Gas? Big boom - need a new bucket.

E-glychol? Nothing - nada - squat

Of course, I would never be stupid enough to replicate this experiment.