I’ve not seen the report of how high the flames were, just that the car/SUV was engulfed in flames. It is very odd that a car thats “engulfed” or where flames were very high would not cause more damage to that vehicle. What would cause a flash fire that wouldn’t damage the headrests (as seen from the rear) and leave the rest of the vehicle looking relatively unscathed (from the rear). Even the paving bricks underneath the car, outside the garage, are blackened. If the “anti-freeze” or some other “accelerant” had leaked under the car and outside, again, why isn’t the vehicle more damaged?
I have not seen a report that she was burnt beyond recognition.....only ones where the coroner/autopsy person wouldn’t absolutely identify the body as hers (maybe dental records weren’t provided yet or for privacy reasons?) Have you seen something more specific?
Go to the link at post 324 - in the video about 6-7 seconds in - it is an eyewitness report from the neighbor across the street.
"why isn’t the vehicle more damaged?"
The flames burnt through the roof of the garage in front of the vehicle that was partially backed out of the garage. This caused the fire to go up versus out. It was put out so fast (less than 15 minutes) it did not have time to fully incinerate the car.
From the fire videos, it looked like the fire was contained to the front of the vehicle. Hence, no damage to the back.
I have to look back through the previous threads regarding the state of the body. I remember conflicting reports (i.e., no major trauma, body was burnt, Police and Fire could not identify the body at the scene).