Skip to comments.
Will The Next Generation Of Top Guns Be Gamer Geeks?
Fast Company ^
| 2/8/2011
| Kit Eaton
Posted on 02/08/2011 6:13:35 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
They say this about every technological advance when it comes to war, and they are always wrong...you are still going to need boots on the ground to hold it and defeat your enemy.
2
posted on
02/08/2011 6:15:51 PM PST
by
gman992
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
3
posted on
02/08/2011 6:21:48 PM PST
by
Sparticus
(Tar and feathers for the first dumbass Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
To: gman992
This story is about replacing fighter pilots and a plane that can pull more G’s than a human can stand, not infantrymen.
4
posted on
02/08/2011 6:21:54 PM PST
by
Bryanw92
(We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
You’re always going to need ground pounders; boots brains and brawn to hold and secure area. Robots, drones, remotely piloted vehicles will all have a part to play, but outside of sterilizing an area the only way to control it is to have some presence comprised of individuals capable of responding to unforeseen circumstances. There’s no way you could build an autonomous machine that a Taliban, Vietcong or good ol’ boy couldn’t figure out how to circumvent and destroy.
I still think Heinlein nailed it best in Starship Troopers.
It would be ironic, though, if the kids who spent their youth playing Xbox end up being the Top Guns of the next decade.
5
posted on
02/08/2011 6:23:08 PM PST
by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
That’s making the [incorrect] assumption that the current generation of “Top Guns” aren’t gamer geeks already.
6
posted on
02/08/2011 6:25:02 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: gman992
While 'tis true that infantry soldiers will likely never go out of style, removing the pilot from the cockpit is becoming increasingly feasible. Technology will probably soon serve to make the simulator the combat information center of a sophisticated air superiority or ground attack drone.
Without the need for the human physically aboard the aircraft, the plane can be made to perform turns and changes in acceleration that would reduce a human into a blacked out puddle of flesh. Time on station could be increased. The plane could be lighter and smaller profiled, but just as capable or more so, as the need to design around the human and his support systems vanishes. The benefits could be enormous.
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
I'd say that lots of the new Top Guns ARE Gamer Geeks. We allowed our son to play Nintendo, Playstation, etc, because it really does improve hand-eye coordination. You just have to limit the amount of time and make sure they do other things too, like sports/music/etc. Our son is now in training to be a Marine Aviator.
To: Bryanw92
This story is about replacing fighter pilots and a plane that can pull more Gs than a human can stand, not infantrymen. At best you're not replacing the fighter pilot, you're simply relocating him.
Missiles can pull more Gs than any UAV, and remote operation is too great a single point of failure to take the fighter pilot out of the cockpit. A ground support UAV that needs to circle for 24 hours at a time, sure. But not for air dominance.
9
posted on
02/08/2011 6:28:03 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: gman992
“They say this about every technological advance when it comes to war, and they are always wrong...you are still going to need boots on the ground to hold it and defeat your enemy.”
We’ve got many “gamer geeks” where I work. They are amorphous blobs of quivering Jello, meek, cowardly and easily confused in the real world.
10
posted on
02/08/2011 6:30:03 PM PST
by
dljordan
("His father's sword he hath girded on, And his wild harp slung behind him")
To: originalbuckeye; Yo-Yo
But they meaning that they will be piloting drones(X-47,X-37) in a air conditioned room at Langley or in the Pentagon. Gamers are already piloting planes but thrust of the article is emphasizing pilotless planes
To: dljordan
But they would probably be great remote fighter pilots!.......
12
posted on
02/08/2011 6:35:42 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(Whenever these vermin call you an 'idiot', you can be sure that you are doing something right.)
To: originalbuckeye
There is a difference between kids that play video games and kids that can only play video games.
13
posted on
02/08/2011 6:38:16 PM PST
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
Judging from my son’s friends, the actual pilots are Gamer Geeks, too!
To: originalbuckeye
Hey, I landed a plane on a carrier simulator and it was my first time.Collected $300
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
16
posted on
02/08/2011 6:42:28 PM PST
by
Safrguns
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
To: Sparticus
19
posted on
02/08/2011 7:23:53 PM PST
by
mcshot
(So this is how it feels to be flushed. The "that's impossible" days are upon us.)
To: Yo-Yo
With control software programmed for autonomous hunter-killer operation, a few units could absolutely dominate local airspace for as long as they have fuel - and without requiring any pilot attention. They would not even require active communication links during the patrol.
Without need for the weight of a pilot life support system, the next generation of UAVs could be designed to detect and outmaneuver ground-launched missiles.
What could possibly go wron-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson