How about her actions? Anyone can say anything. Her actions seem to say that she doesn't care about paying her bills or working hard. Her actions seem to say that she thrives on media attention.
How is pointing that out a "vicious" attack?
I wasn’t referring to your answer when I was talking about vicious attacks? Yours were part of a whole picture.
But I get from your response that you agree that neocons aren’t Conservative, they do want to destroy Conservatives through personal attacks, but you don’t think their attacks would be called vicious, perhaps justified.
Yes, when you don’t like somebody, when you want to hurt them, you can attack them. I’m just pointing out the neocons don’t like conservatives and want to hurt them. And they don’t argue about policy, because they would reveal themselves as being unconservative. So they attack her personally.
The Conservative (Christine) was attacked by the enemy (the neocons fairly. I shouldn’t have said that the neocon enemy was vicious. But the behavior of the neocons toward the conservative was the behavior of one enemy to another.
I am afraid she is our version of Al Sharpton. She is going to use politics as a way of supporting herself financially. Lets not kid ourselves, she was not a good candidate. She doesn’t kid herself, the last thing she expects is to actually win. This way she can support herself without having to actually work for a living, like Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.