Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC unveils plans to overhaul rural phone service fund to provide high-speed Internet access
LA Times ^ | January 6, 2011

Posted on 02/08/2011 1:41:03 PM PST by LonelyCon

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski on Monday unveiled a plan to overhaul a much-criticized program that helps provide phone service to far-flung rural areas, proposing to focus it on expanding high-speed Internet access to those same locations.

The $8-billion Universal Service Fund is paid for by telecommunications companies, who must contribute a percentage of their long-distance revenue, often passing those fees on to their customers. The decades-old program has successfully spread phone service to residents in hard-to-reach areas that often are unprofitable for companies to serve, Genachowski said in a speech to the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.

But the fund has become highly inefficient, he said. In some cases, it pays more than $20,000 a year to provide a single home with phone service.

"The program is still designed to support traditional telephone service. It’s a 20th century program poorly suited for the challenges of a 21st century world," Genachowski said. "In its current state, the program is not getting the job done. It’s leaving millions on the outside looking in, and wasting taxpayer dollars every year."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fcc; internet; phone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
So, let's see: a government program that has been proven to waste taxpayer money to provide subsidized (=socialized) phone service for rural people is going to be expanded to provide subsidized internet service and that's somehow an "improvement"?
1 posted on 02/08/2011 1:41:11 PM PST by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
The $8-billion Universal Service Fund is paid for by telecommunications companies, who must contribute a percentage of their long-distance revenue, often passing those fees on to their customers

Its a tax on YOU. The LA Times wants to talk all around it and not say it. YOU are paying for it.

2 posted on 02/08/2011 1:43:51 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php for FR backup site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Another waste of money. Get rid of the USF.


3 posted on 02/08/2011 1:44:03 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
Well, hey - it's not like it was their money. It's your money. So it's all good. Not.
4 posted on 02/08/2011 1:44:19 PM PST by Noumenon ("We should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hanged.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Huh? I have a property in a very rural area. Everyone has a cell phone and everyone has internet access without government help. Weird.


5 posted on 02/08/2011 1:44:50 PM PST by svcw (God doesn't show up in our time, but He shows up on time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

How many people are using landlines these days anyway?

The number is probably higher in the rural areas but its getting to the point where cell service is more common than land line. I’ve got a land line but only because I don’t get good cell reception here.


6 posted on 02/08/2011 1:45:22 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Once every home is wired for high-speed Internet, the next “problem” to solve will be a need for every person to own the latest computers so they can use said Internet. Of course a computer is useless without software, so that will need to be dealt with as well... same for laser printers, printing supplies, anti-virus software, and so on.


7 posted on 02/08/2011 1:46:11 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

That was the excuse, it really provides un paid for service to the ghetto, to buy votes for democrats.


8 posted on 02/08/2011 1:46:13 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I’m on one of them there high speed cable internets myself.


9 posted on 02/08/2011 1:46:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

So instead of discontinueing an obsolete tax they will justify it by spending it.

“If it moves, tax it; if it keeps moving regulate it; if it stops moving, subsidize it.”


10 posted on 02/08/2011 1:47:18 PM PST by MrKatykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Regulating communications is not an enumerated power granted to Congress in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution and therefore is a power reserved to the states or the people. Consequently the mere existence of the FCC is Unconstitutional and must be abolished.


11 posted on 02/08/2011 1:47:54 PM PST by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
My local, rural phone Co. got a multi-million grant from the stimulus bill to get high speed Internet to rural residences.

I thank all of you for my newly connected, high speed, fiber optic connection. It does make it easier to FReep. :^)

12 posted on 02/08/2011 1:48:17 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

So what’s wrong with Hughes-net, and Wild Blue? They work just fine.


13 posted on 02/08/2011 1:48:21 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
This one really burns my ass...

14 posted on 02/08/2011 1:48:58 PM PST by TSgt (Colonel Allen West & Michele Bachman - 2012 POTUS Dream Team Ticket!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

It’s the Gore tax.

Am I the only one that sees the irony here?

Taxes on phone service is being used to provide internet services.

Internet services are being used to bypass phone services (internet phone calls, conference calls, video calls, instant messaging, social sites like facebook, etc... are all eating into phone services).

The phone companies originally pushed for this tax, because they had a monopoly technology and thought the government would help them build their business. Instead, the tax on telephone service is being used to create a service (internet) that will eventually be the demise of traditional phone service.

Ironic.


15 posted on 02/08/2011 1:49:38 PM PST by Brookhaven (Moderates = non-thinkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

I believe that this also ties in with the deal cut with a company, LightSquared, which grants LightSquared access to a piece of spectrum that will destroy GPS service in the USA.

If allowed to go forward, all existing commercial GPS units would become obsolete. LightSquared is apparently well connected to the Administration and the FCC, in their
January 26 action, has waived many of their standard procedures.

There is also additional detail on the issue at

http://freegeographytools.com/2011/how-the-fcc-plans-to-destroy-gps-a-simple-explanation

This is just another example of Obama’s regulatory zeal.


16 posted on 02/08/2011 1:50:24 PM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

This is going to be the forth or fifth time this has been shot down by the courts.

They have no authority to do this.

Last time this was done with Clinton, he ignored the ruling and continued to collect it.

Then Bush came in, and his administration continued to collect it too.

Obeying the courts is for us dumb Americans, the intelligentsia doesn’t have to.


17 posted on 02/08/2011 1:51:31 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
They can't regulate your thermostat, count your water usrage, cap your electric use, or tell if anyone is in the house without it.

It's for future regulatory plans.

18 posted on 02/08/2011 1:51:45 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Interesting thought. Creepy but interesting.


19 posted on 02/08/2011 1:55:53 PM PST by svcw (God doesn't show up in our time, but He shows up on time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
If the FCC were really looking to help poor folks they would make cable and satellite providers sell the public packages that they want and let them pick the channels. This would save people more money than anything when it comes to news,etc.The trouble is the Liberals choose who they want to help that helped them. They are not really looking out for poor people. Just like all the waivers Obama is passing out. Honestly most folks in America are not enlightened and that is why P.T. Obama and the liberals get away with this crap.
20 posted on 02/08/2011 1:56:39 PM PST by RocketRoland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson