Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notary Sojac

“But because it does not define life as of the instant of conception, will the pro-life movement treat it with contempt??”

I am betting yes.


12 posted on 02/08/2011 11:14:43 AM PST by Grunthor (Enemy of the state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Grunthor
Who in the pro-life movement would treat the saving of thousands of lives with contempt?

Who have you been talking to to think that?

16 posted on 02/08/2011 11:23:50 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Grunthor

you are right.. look at what happened here in CO when that type of bill was introduced. It went down in flames because conception isn’t where the fight needs to be taken. I stated that if a heartbeat bill was introduced, we had a better chance during the mid-terms and got flamed here because too many people here want it outlawed altogether instead of incrementally... which is where it needs to start. In small increments like this.


45 posted on 02/09/2011 9:41:37 AM PST by killermedic (Git some, baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Grunthor

*“But because it does not define life as of the instant of conception, will the pro-life movement treat it with contempt??”*

“I am betting yes.”

For what it’s worth, I just got off the phone with some of the local pro-life leadership and all I got was cheering. At the national level it remains to be seen. But in my corner of the world it seems a lot of people like it.


47 posted on 02/09/2011 9:57:06 AM PST by MichaelCorleone (Sarah Palin is America's Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson