Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kingu

***Good, the Chinese should continue to waste billions of dollars seeking a technology that is utterly useless.***

I too wondered why they would go as far as to arm a Soviet era Golf diesel-electric with SLBM when they already have their 091, 092, 093, 094, a rumored 095 & 096, and even a speculative 097 program to boot. It must also be known however that this Golf diesel-electric has been well known to be a test bed for other SLBM since the days of the 091.

This suggests to me one thing: What the ChiCom’s are in fact saying is that they had succeeded in the launching of DF-31 ICBM from a hull that were not intended for the launching of ICBM class missiles and that is a great feat on the part of these Commies :).

After all, if they can arm the Golf diesel-electric with a DF-31 ICBM, what then does that say about their future Golf diesel-electrics such as their 039 Ming class, their 040 Song class, their 041 Yuan class, and their recently declassified and supposedly upgraded 041 Super Yuan hull???

***They should develop even greater stealth technologies for these boomers, and spend even more money building the largest fleet ever. Hope Russia revives their boomer program and spends billions on it as well.***

Unlike us north Americans and those of us in the Anglo world, Russia 2011, I’m afraid, had already given up their military aggressiveness and assertiveness and unlikely to see the Chinese as a military rival no more. In fact, just as how I see relationships going into the future between the United States and the Chinese, which is leaning towards what are “Superfusion”, eventually, so are relationships between the Russians and the Chinese one of detente, mutual respect, and one of mutual cooperation because it’s the only way to go for these big boys.

Therefore, relationships between Russia and China would be one that’s based economic competitions and, eventually, one of cooperation based on mutual benefits or how the wall street people would take to the merging of one conglomerate with another as a means of economic survival.

Sorry, gotta go. no time, the grandkid getting cranky!


43 posted on 02/16/2011 9:05:20 AM PST by EdisonOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TheEditor

Minus the 2 new kids on the block - India & Pakistan (and an undeclared Israel), China had the LEAST number of nuclear weapons. She also pledge a “no first use” of nuclear weapon.

With a history of humiliation from Western countries domination the last 150 or so years ago notwithstanding as late as 1750 having a third (1/3) i.e. 33.33% of the World’s GNP (Gross national Products), China must have a deterrence weapon against any powers in the world.

In a few years China is poised to be the largest economy and in time, perhaps the richest country taking his historical place in the world.

1) ASBM is NOT a money-waster. Consider this:- If Chinese missile can hit a satellite target, the size of a mini-van travelling at 20,000 km/h (yes, twenty thousand km per hour), what make you think that the same missile cannot be able to strike a gigantic size carrier which traveled at a tortoise speed?
The key words here is NOT whether China would strike or not - great probability China will NEVER used it against the US or any country for that matter - but the effect is DETERRENCE

2) The SLBM of JL-2 has also the deterrence effect in that it would give China a alternative platform to have a “second-strike capability”

That is all. No intention of China to threaten any country using ASBM or JL-2. China want a “peaceful and harmonious rise”.


44 posted on 05/16/2011 7:11:26 AM PDT by JosephTan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson