Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pallis

Great debate, at least, exists over whether using ethanol instead of petroleum is a net petroleum saver.


42 posted on 02/07/2011 11:53:39 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
"...over whether using ethanol instead of petroleum is a net petroleum saver."

Ethanol has already lost that debate. Even Gore, not exactly a bright bulb, has realized it. Ethanol was an act of desperation, something the environmental extremists had to put up to prove an alternative energy exists, something they thought could work now, rather than some point in the future when the technology is better. It had the political plus of providing subsidies to farmers and ethanol producers. Money and fun for all, except the end users. Fact is, the modern world needs carbon fuels to run, and there is nothing to take their place, excepting nuclear energy for the power grids.

55 posted on 02/07/2011 12:36:21 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson