Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative

Surely not all areas of the Gulf coast were affected the same by the infamous spill. What’s bothersome is the lack of transparency about how seafood is screened. Last I heard, they were counting on humans to literally smell out the tainted parts of the catch. While that might detect grossly contaminated fish, it doesn’t raise great confidence about smaller degrees of contamination. If the official fish smeller is getting a cold, he or she could let some bad stuff by. Why not, at least, use dogs?


17 posted on 02/06/2011 10:18:30 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

http://www.louisianaseafoodnews.com/2011/01/02/a-step-by-step-journey-how-gulf-seafood-is-deemed-%E2%80%9Csafe%E2%80%9D/


19 posted on 02/07/2011 4:52:34 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson