[jacknhoo]

Yeah, and Andy Stanley also has a sermon online where he insinuates we should give the so-called prophet muhammed a pass on all the evil things he did when he was alive, because we should take in to account that that is what people were doing during that time in history...raiding, pillaging, raping, stealing, etc. That somehow, because people were doing those things that we shouldn't hold a prophet of God to higher standards. What a bunch of baloney!

[BelleAl]

I own that sermon series and I don’t agree with your assessment.

He was not defending the Muslim faith. He explained its origins in historical, theological terms and stated Jesus is the only one who does not have to be justified in context of his cultural/historical environment.

People may have been raping, pillaging during that timeframe and the prophet of Islam engaged in these practices, but Andy made it very clear that Jesus is guilty of no offenses. No explanation or justification needed in the case of how Jesus lived His life.