[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

I'll post this one....

***************************EXCERPT*********************************

old engineer says:

February 4, 2011 at 9:47 pm

Consider what organization brought the suit and what they want- “whether the air board was adequately addressing the impacts of implementing AB32 on disadvantaged communities.”

It seems to me that this is an attempt to get CARB to direct the money from the carbon trading to “disadvantaged communities.” It is not about judging the merits of CO2 control.

[Publius6961]

Bookmark

[calcowgirl]

Hi, Ernest.

Norm posted the SF Chron article yesterday:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2668317/posts

The decision is not really good news - things could actually get worse.
Here is the judges decision (none of the articles have articulated the issues well)
http://cdn.law.ucla.edu/SiteCollectionDocuments/Environmental%20Law/AIR%20v%20ARB%20Tentative%20Ruling.pdf